"Night of Champions" is one of WWE's yearly pay-per-view events and it is one that wrestling fans have tuned in for time and time again. With every championship on the line, it's clear that a great deal of attention is going to be placed on it. That being said, I cannot help but feel as though the show wasn't nearly as effective as it could have been. There were many reasons for this and I feel as though an Internet marketing company could have come into play in tremendous fashion.
Amongst the many elements of "Night of Champions," one of them came across as rather frustrating. With the interactive polls WWE orchestrated, fans were allowed to vote on who they believed to be the best World Heavyweight Champion, United States Champion, and a few others. With each option being given five separate candidates, it is clear that the element of choice isn't necessarily strong. As a result, there is an illusion of options but nothing substantial in order to back it up, making the polling seem worthless.
In fact, I cannot help but feel as though a poll of this nature would have been better if networking had more of an influence. For example, what if Twitter was allowed in order to let fans send their tweets on who they believed were the best champions of each category? Tweets are easier to keep track of and it lets the fans become more involved. It sounds like a much better system than locking fans to predetermined choices without any kind of room to move around.
If any authority could come into effect to make this better, it would have to be an Internet marketing company. In my eyes, firms like fishbat are able to see just how important choices are and how they play into fan interaction overall all. Fans want to be able to have as much selection as possible so that they can be certain they aren't confined to just a couple of ideas. This, to me, has the potential to be a much more effective model than any other in the past.
WWE may be known for its cases of revisionist history but I cannot help but feel as though their choices are a tad confusing. Why shouldn't fans have more options when it comes to these polls? In fact, why should individuals have to be locked to particular choices at all? As I alluded to earlier, I feel as though Twitter would be the absolute best platform for WWE to conduct its polls within because it just seems like there's more of an opportunity for interaction here than any other platform.
Amongst the many elements of "Night of Champions," one of them came across as rather frustrating. With the interactive polls WWE orchestrated, fans were allowed to vote on who they believed to be the best World Heavyweight Champion, United States Champion, and a few others. With each option being given five separate candidates, it is clear that the element of choice isn't necessarily strong. As a result, there is an illusion of options but nothing substantial in order to back it up, making the polling seem worthless.
In fact, I cannot help but feel as though a poll of this nature would have been better if networking had more of an influence. For example, what if Twitter was allowed in order to let fans send their tweets on who they believed were the best champions of each category? Tweets are easier to keep track of and it lets the fans become more involved. It sounds like a much better system than locking fans to predetermined choices without any kind of room to move around.
If any authority could come into effect to make this better, it would have to be an Internet marketing company. In my eyes, firms like fishbat are able to see just how important choices are and how they play into fan interaction overall all. Fans want to be able to have as much selection as possible so that they can be certain they aren't confined to just a couple of ideas. This, to me, has the potential to be a much more effective model than any other in the past.
WWE may be known for its cases of revisionist history but I cannot help but feel as though their choices are a tad confusing. Why shouldn't fans have more options when it comes to these polls? In fact, why should individuals have to be locked to particular choices at all? As I alluded to earlier, I feel as though Twitter would be the absolute best platform for WWE to conduct its polls within because it just seems like there's more of an opportunity for interaction here than any other platform.
About the Author:
Visit SEO Long Island company, fishbat, if you're seeking additional information about Internet marketing with SEO.
0 comments:
Enregistrer un commentaire